I spent a couple of years working towards a PhD in Ancient History, but ultimately fell apart and wasn’t able to complete it. It’s possible, but not probable, that I’ll get back into it one day…but enough of that.
The project was focused on ways of reading the Book of Revelation as political resistance literature (in the context of 1st century Roman Asia Minor), and a significant part of it was the issue of authorship. Now, I do realise that a lot of people will find all of this terribly boring, but I think it’s actually quite an interesting question, and I’ll try to explain why here.
Essentially, I’m convinced that we are asking all the wrong questions about who wrote the Book of Revelation.
Continue reading We’re asking all the wrong questions about who wrote the Book of Revelation
The work of theology is never done.
The work of theology is never done because we theologise in our own space; unending glimpses of grace from within our own situatedness.
The work of theology is never done because contexts change like sand on the shore, perhaps looking like the day before but never quite the same.
Continue reading The Work of Theology is Never Done
In this post, my second concerning ANZAC Day, I want to focus on—and challenge—the way in which the language of redemptive sacrifice has been applied to those who die in battle.
An interesting phenomenon seems to have crept into many churches whereby the language of Jesus’ death on the cross is commonly (mis)applied to the death of soldiers in the ANZAC tradition. You may have seen some of the pictures that float around social media at these times with a picture of a (possibly silhouetted) soldier, perhaps a flag, and a cross, with a bible quote attached to bring the message home. Usually, this bible quote is taken from the gospel of John, chapter 15, verse 13:
Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends.
Continue reading ANZAC Day and the Language of Redemptive Sacrifice
Today is Good Friday.
I want to use this opportunity, if I may, to set out (more or less) clearly some things I’ve been thinking about recently in regards to the death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth — things that may seem a little different to what is often called the “traditional” view, but things that I think are helpful in understanding what this event actually means.
By the way, this is going to be quite a long post, so you may want to get comfortable if you’re going to read it all the way through…
Continue reading Understanding Easter (or “A Short Easter Essay”)
I am convinced that Christians in Australia—if we are truly to call ourselves Christian—must engage deeply with issues of ‘reconciliation’ between Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Peoples and other Australians. In fact, I have come to the point where I think this needs to be at the very core of the ‘good news’ that Christians in Australia should be embodying.
Continue reading A Ministry of Reconciliation
The most recent (and I do hate that I have to distinguish between so many) mass shooting in the U.S. has reignited fierce debates over gun control and the place of the Second Amendment.
At this point in time, those who desire change remain deadlocked in debate with those who oppose any such legislation. The NRA has publicly stated that the best way forward is more guns, and the Second Amendment is being used as the ideological basis of much of the resistance to gun control measures.
I have already posted my thoughts about the need for more gun control in the U.S. (and my disgust at the actions of the NRA), and I don’t wish to revisit that conversation here. I want, rather, to talk briefly here about the very interesting ways in which the Second Amendment is interpreted and applied. I think it is actually quite revealing, and the discussion is of great help in regards to thinking about biblical interpretation and application (something about which I am very interested).
Please let me illustrate the link.
Continue reading The Second Amendment and (Biblical) Hermeneutics
So, here we are at the final post in this 5-part series. If you’ve made it this far, then I tip my hat to you : )
In the first post, I suggested that the traditional interpretive frameworks for approaching the book of Revelation are all a bit naff, and that we would be better off approaching the text with a more well-rounded triple-layered approach consisting of a contextual examination, an intertextual examination, and a literary-rhetorical examination. In the next three posts, I explained each of these ‘layers’ in order seeking to lay-out a reasonably comprehensive introduction to approaching the text in the space available here (excluding, obviously, detailed exegetical examination).
In this last post, I want to try to bring it all together (…as best I can). In order to do that, I am basically going to be asking the following questions:
1) What did the text mean to the original recipients?
2) What might it mean to us?
Continue reading Reading Revelation (Part V)