A Reflection on Sameness and Difference for Australia/Survival/Invasion Day

It seems to me that one of the significant causes of tension around Australia/Survival/Invasion Day is the increasing tendency towards narrowly defined (and increasingly aggressive) nationalism in majority Australian society.

Now, please let me say this clearly: there is nothing necessarily wrong with being proud of one’s nation or culture or identity. Having a positive (though not blinkered) view of one’s identity is fine; it’s when this identity seeks to define itself over and against the other in negative terms that we have the beginnings of the problem.

In the words of Croatian theologian Miroslav Volf, this type of situation ends up in exclusion, which can manifest itself either as a cutting off from interdependence (the other becomes the enemy), or as the disintegration of the difference (the other becomes assimilated).

This is the sort of thing, I think, we’re seeing around ‘Australia Day’ (as well as ANZAC Day and in general conversations that include discussions of ‘national identity’), in regards both to attitudes towards Indigenous Australians and towards ‘new’ Australians. The only options, it seems, are either full assimilation or (therefore necessary) separation. One can either (quite literally) lose themselves in the prevailing culture, or they can, as is so eloquently put in numerous social media memes, f@#k off!

Such a limited and aggressive understanding of identity is distressing in so many ways.

But is there really no other option? Are we Australians so small-minded that ‘sameness’ is really the best that we can come up with?

I don’t think so. Though the angry voices for ‘unity’-based-on-exclusion are usually the loudest, I am convinced both that there is a better way and that Australians, in general, are clever enough and big-hearted enough to embrace it.

In Volf’s words:

We are who we are not because we are separate from others who are next to us, but because we are both separate and connected, both distinct and related; the boundaries that mark our identities are both barriers and bridges.*

Surely we can be sophisticated enough to recognise difference within our larger category of what it means to be ‘Australian’. We can be different but still united; we can be united but still different.

(In another post, I may seek to explore the theology of this in more detail. I’ll say here simply that this is part of the very core of Christian theology.)

This, it seems to me, would allow us to recognise that Indigenous Australians can ‘be Australian’ in a different way than I, as an Australian of British heritage, am, and that different Indigenous Australians will do so in a variety of ways (i.e. there is not just one way of being an ‘Indigenous Australian’). In the same way, more recent arrivals to our shores should be able to embrace what it means to be ‘Australian’ without needing to lose what it is that makes them who they are.

Personally, I can’t see how ‘being Australian’ can mean anything else.

_______________
* Miroslav Volf, Exclusion & Embrace, p. 66.

Advertisements

Published by

Josh Dowton

Student of history/theology/nonviolence/permaculture/missional thinking. Large of limb, red of hair. Semper in excretia sumus, solum profundum variat.

4 thoughts on “A Reflection on Sameness and Difference for Australia/Survival/Invasion Day”

  1. I’m really struggling with how to approach Australia Day lately… I’m very concerned regarding the Invasion/Survival Day aspect. As a white middle (probably upper middle) class male I wonder about how other,s especially indigenous Australians, view today.

    1. Personally, I am convinced that we need to change the day. There is way too much historical ‘baggage’ associated with January 26, and it wasn’t really ‘Australia’ Day at all, anyway (but rather the establishment of the British penal colony of New South Wales). Seeking to celebrate this day as ‘Australia’ day (for all Australians) seems, to me, an impossible task.

      I don’t know if there is any really possibility of changing the day, but surely there is another day that all Australians can come together on. Perhaps, when we finally become a republic, we can simply use the June long weekend as “Australia Day’. We have too many public holidays anyway; why do we need one so soon after Christmas and New Year’s anyway : )

      1. Yeah, it does seem like the day we became a federation is more appropriate for “Australia” day. I’m with regarding the public holiday being so close, perhaps we could move incorporate it into labour day and make that a longer weekend?? I’m sure that wouldn’t go down to well lol.
        Regardless, having a “citizens’ day” or something less inflammatory could be appropriate. I don’t think the (white) majority is ready for this nor will it be anytime soon.

  2. I’m with you a change of day. There is noting glorious, new or intentional to celebrate about in regard to 26 January. I like the idea of federation day/Australia Day. I reckon it is a long way off though.
    I resonate with the Miroslav Volf concept of separate/connected and distinct related. Until we can see that as a viable and desirable option we will perpetuate the current polar positions.
    We, those of us who can see a different way, need to be telling stories and speaking up the ideas. If not more damage will be done, more people hurt, more divisions creeated and the Kingdom will be just that much further out of our consciousness.

    Brian

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s